Prelude to Propaganda series.
I was hesitant to begin this, because although I was very politically active years ago, I’ve since then come to the conclusion that the American people were either too lazy, stupid, or apathetic to even want to help themselves, so I instead decided to take steps to secure my own future against the impending economic collapse, and the whole slew of political and social horrors that will surely accompany it. I’m convinced that the average American is going to sit on his ass in front of the televison guzzling beer for as long as he can get away with it, and only after a few days of hunger will he start to contemplate our dire political and economic situations. Naturally, it would be much wiser and easier to address these problems while peaceful options are still available, but I fear this time is quickly drawing to a close. Everyone who matters has already lost confidence in our government and economy, and that’s all it takes to set the wheels in motion.
That being the case, I’m also inclined to partially agree with Henry Kissinger, who once described us all as "useless eaters", and since I also agree that there are too many people on the planet, it’s probably best to let most of these morons fall by the wayside anyway. The most intelligent of the human species already understands our situation, and are informing others who are also worth saving, and this is as close as we’ll get to a natural selection process that will benefit the human race. If some must die, it may as well be those who refuse to contribute to society in any way, as well as those who lack the moral fibre required to see any benefit in doing so.
What I don’t see as beneficial to the species is the only eugenics plan that presently exists, which consists of the rich killing off the poor. The rich are weak, spoiled, lazy, and usually inbred, while poor people tend to be stronger, more resourceful, and more adaptable to adverse situations. We should also attempt to save the most highly educated people in our society, but not the recently educated, because our colleges and universities have been so thoroughly corrupted by the enemy that it’s become more of an indoctrination than an education, leaving many graduates with enough sophomoric arrogance to feel they never have to learn again, but unable to think critically, and lacking any of the knowledge that motivates people to question authority. Unfortunately, most of the people educated in this country are already working for the enemy, whether they know it or not.
I’m also inclined to partially agree with the Una-bomber. Not in his methods, but in his insistence that science and technology have gone too far, and have become detrimental to the planet, the human species, and all other species as well. Scientific achievements are usually in the interests of the military anyway, unless they can be later peddled to the public in gadget form, and any new medical miracles will only be available to the rich. As a community, the scientists and doctors are either silent, or lying, rendering their knowledge either useless, or detrimental, and rendering themselves little more than another dangerous element in our midst.
I don’t argue or enter into debates, because the issue here is exactly what you would bring to the debate, which is the wealth of erroneous information that allowed our situation to become as dire as it is in the first place. Your argument would consist of phoney statistics, historical fables, the newspaper’s latest lies, and profit-driven "science." My argument is simple. Discover who controls everything you’ve been told, only believe what you can verify for yourself through original documentation, science and logic, and then look for a political connection between the sources of all the erroneous information. Find the motives behind the lies. If you did that, there would be no debate, and we would all agree on whose head should roll, as the saying goes.
Global warming, 9-11, the Oklahoma City bombing, and a host of other memorable events of our "history" are all easily proven to be hoaxes, but many Americans continue to believe the same sources of false information as if it were their religion.
This is no insult to the intelligence of people who believe these events happened as we were told, because all people, dim or bright, can only form opinions based on the information available to them. We’re all in the situation we should have expected when all sources of information fell under the control of a few people with the same political agenda, which is exactly what’s allowing this country to be destroyed, as planned. We were lied to on a grand scale, but the control of the media is so complete that it would have been difficult, if not impossible for anyone to know it. Before 9-11, I didn’t know it, but that event exposed the ability of every source of information to tell the same lie, and stick to that lie, in defiance of what was once eighth-grade science. Since then, I’ve had the time and curiosity to re-examine much of what is commonly referred to as "history", and I now understand why people don’t learn from it. That simple reason being that they don’t know it, despite the fact that many people are familiar with an assortment of lies taught in "history" classes in American schools. There’s a big difference between school history and real history, and your knowledge of school history is only good for passing tests. A horrible real history is presently repeating itself, as real history always does, but the students of school history are ill-equipt to prepare for it, or even see it coming. And despite studying economics in America’s best universities, they remain unaware of monetary systems that could end all poverty within a year. I’m sure you’ve studied hard and learned a lot, but what’s most important now, is the information that’s been kept hidden from you.
In most cases, the lies become obvious as soon as you see all the relevant facts that weren’t reported in the "news", so the next questions should be "who owns the news, what is their political agenda (which motivates everyone in the news business), and what are their motives for lying, or hiding important information? I had a desire to know the truth once I realized I was lied to, but it seems that most people try very hard to deny the truth, because the lies are a lot more comfortable to believe. There is a recent historical precedent for what I’m describing; after world war two, when the horrors of the concentration camps and Nazi aggression were revealed to all, it turned out that the German people had no idea what was actually going on in their name. Goebbels’ propaganda machine had the entire nation fooled, and since the sciences of behavioral technology and brain function have come a long way in sixty years, you might have guessed that the C.I.A. has learned a few new tricks since Goebbels’ time.
My curiosity has guided me down a path of discovery that has shown me a lot that’s been kept hidden from the general public, and since few people seem to be aware of these facts, I’ll try to relay some of what I’ve learned. If I tried to tell you what was actually happening in the world today it would take hours, and you wouldn’t believe me anyway, because you’ve been taught to dismiss truth as lunacy. You’re going to have to look into this for yourself, if you care. If you don’t care, you’ll probably be one of those who falls by the wayside, and if that’s the case, exiting the gene pool may be your strongest possible contribution to society. What follows is part of mine, which will be posted on the internet for general consumption.
Saturday, January 9, 2010
Propaganda 1
Propaganda 1
Okay. Let’s begin having a look at some modern propaganda techniques.
On two separate occasions, someone mentioned something to me about terrorism, or the war on terror, and I responded by asking "you do know that there is indisputable scientific evidence that proves beyond any doubt that the Twin Towers were demolished with explosives, right?" For me, any discussion of terrorism has to begin with the understanding of what actually happened on 9-11, rather than what we were told to believe.
On both occasions, the person I was talking to responded by saying "I heard that the president of Mexico saw a UFO."
The first time this happened, I shook my head and thought to myself "what the hell is this girl thinking? Maybe the president of Mexico sniffs glue and sees all kinds of things, but what does one thing have to do with the other? How did she make the jump from 9-11 to Mexican UFO’s without a sentence between the two subjects?
The second time it happened I thought to myself "Holy shit. This is a conditioned response." Somehow, the herd has been taught to immediately make an association with UFO’s, Bigfoot, or the ghost of Elvis whenever someone talks to them about crimes committed by people within our government. This is incredibly convenient for a government comprised of crooks and perverts, but how did they accomplish this?
If you take a look at a typical "conspiracy website", you’ll see all kinds of revelations about the 9-11 attacks, the FEMA concentration camps, and possibly the latest information on that shadowy and elusive group known only as "The New World Order," and you’ll also see the latest crop circle designs, the most recent UFO photos, the image of Christ in an ice cube, a first-hand account from the man who wrestled Bigfoot, the true location of the sunken city of Atlantis, and all manner of non-sense designed to make any important information appear ridiculous by this association.
The Daily Globe is one of two newspapers I’m aware of that exists for this same purpose. This is one of the thin papers that usually sports a headline involving 800-pound Siamese twins suing each other for and against surgical separation, or the poor man whose wife was mysteriously transformed into a hammer-head shark. Because everyone knows that these newspapers epitomize incredulity, they’re the perfect place to print any information that needs to be immediately discredited. "ALIEN ABDUCTEE SAYS U.S. GOV’T BEHIND 9-11 ATTACKS" would be a probable headline.
See how this works? You don’t have to buy the paper. Nobody does. A few copies are prominently displayed near every supermarket checkout line, and this is what people remember when someone tries to warn them that the government of this nation has gotten completely out of control. Their mind makes an association between the important information, and the ridiculous information, and they feel confident that it’s nothing they need to worry about, but they may carry on the silly conversation about UFO’s and stuff just to be polite. Silently they’re convinced that because you tried to warn them about their criminal government, you must also spend your nights on the roof searching the skies for E.T.
There’s also no shortage of TV and movie characters who openly insist that our government is involved in all kinds of heinous activity, but every last one of them is a lunatic. Cosmo Kramer is a recent example. He promotes alternative medicine, doesn’t trust the government, and besides that, he’s completely off the wall. Not the type of lunatic you would fear, but he’s definitely not someone you would look to for reliable information, or even sane discourse. Look closely at every TV character who questions or mistrusts the government, and you will see that this behavior is linked with one abnormal personality after another. The sub-conscious lesson here is that anyone who questions the government or suggests they may be involved in any crime has an abnormal personality, so you can quickly dismiss everything he has to say. Through decades of repetition of these messages, you’ve been taught to ignore any criminality on the part of anyone in our government, and anyone who might make such an accusation. While you were being so trained, you were robbed of your wealth and freedom.
There are people commonly referred to as "conspiracy theorists". In reality, absolutely no one hangs around theorizing about conspiracies, but this label is applied to anyone who feels a civic duty to warn other Americans of criminal activity within their government. The "conspiracy theorist" is a character that only exists on television and in movies, and this character, who is always a lunatic, was created for you to make an association with when someone tries to warn you about government crimes. The result is that when someone tries to explain to you that your own government is doing all it can to either kill or enslave you, he may as well be crying to you about his wife turning into a shark during his most recent UFO abduction, regardless of any proof he has.
For most Americans, the people on TV have replaced their normal human society, and the exchange of ideas they would have once had with neighbors and others in their community is now fed to them via the almighty tube. They are fed two sides of a debate, allowed to choose between them, and this choice allows them to feel a bond with other people of one opinion or the other, and lets them feel like they’re wise enough to have an opinion in the matter, and free enough to express it. The reality here is that neither side of the debate ever contains the entire truth of the matter, but just enough information, or misinformation, to make them feel they’re informed, and give them something to enter a futile debate with, if they did actually talk to their neighbor. Political correctness silenced the rest of them by teaching a reluctance to saying or hearing anything controversial or possibly disturbing.
What Americans are shown on TV are allegedly the products of various independent broadcasting companies who compete for viewers who will supposedly watch the commercial messages that are injected into the entertainment, but if this is the case, why the incredible similarity between the allegedly competing companies? Wouldn’t you think that eventually one network or Hollywood studio might experiment with a sane and respectable character who doesn’t trust the government?
Are there any other typified characters that exist on all networks? As it happens, there are many. Just to name a few; every father is an idiot, as is every private citizen who owns a firearm, every mother is an over-worked and under-appreciated slave, everyone who works for the government is a hero who endlessly risks his life for your protection, and everyone who sells drugs is black or hispanic. Every Arab is a screaming madman, and every Jew is kind, gentle and wise. Every homosexual is moral, kind, and intelligent, and everyone who lives in a rural area of the country is an idiot. I don’t need to go on. You can probably name a few of your own, but the important point here is that the same personality traits transcend all characters on all networks. This is obviously no accident.
If we can see common themes and messages that are being foisted upon the public by all networks, it proves that either there is no real competition between them and they all share a common political goal, or that all of their programing is being influenced or dictated by an outside entity, or both. Nothing else can explain the incredible similarity of stereotyped personality traits in all these fictional characters.
Now the next logical step would be to recognize and list as many of these common themes as possible, and see if they all serve a particular political agenda. Just by skimming the surface we see an effort to thwart private gun ownership, discourage masculinity, encourage homosexuality, promote women to "head of household" status, and foster hatred against all Arabs. Then there are the constant attacks on that "antiquated document" known as the Bill of Rights, which permeate every episode of "Law and Order" and "CSI" ** (if not for that silly forth amendment, all those mangled children would be alive, kind of thing).
Whose interests does this propaganda serve? Who benefits by trying to shape public opinion in this direction? Certainly not the TV viewer, because as well see in the next episode of our action-packed adventure through main-stream media propaganda, the TV viewer’s been taught to work against his own self-interests.
"The C.I.A. owns everyone of any significance in the major media."
---- William Colby, former Director of the CIA
"History is a collection of lies that are no longer being disputed." — Napoleon Bonaparte
** first-hand info here – I was subjected to a lot of TV when I was trapped in a motel for six months, otherwise I haven’t allowed the evil device into my home for more than 25 years.
Okay. Let’s begin having a look at some modern propaganda techniques.
On two separate occasions, someone mentioned something to me about terrorism, or the war on terror, and I responded by asking "you do know that there is indisputable scientific evidence that proves beyond any doubt that the Twin Towers were demolished with explosives, right?" For me, any discussion of terrorism has to begin with the understanding of what actually happened on 9-11, rather than what we were told to believe.
On both occasions, the person I was talking to responded by saying "I heard that the president of Mexico saw a UFO."
The first time this happened, I shook my head and thought to myself "what the hell is this girl thinking? Maybe the president of Mexico sniffs glue and sees all kinds of things, but what does one thing have to do with the other? How did she make the jump from 9-11 to Mexican UFO’s without a sentence between the two subjects?
The second time it happened I thought to myself "Holy shit. This is a conditioned response." Somehow, the herd has been taught to immediately make an association with UFO’s, Bigfoot, or the ghost of Elvis whenever someone talks to them about crimes committed by people within our government. This is incredibly convenient for a government comprised of crooks and perverts, but how did they accomplish this?
If you take a look at a typical "conspiracy website", you’ll see all kinds of revelations about the 9-11 attacks, the FEMA concentration camps, and possibly the latest information on that shadowy and elusive group known only as "The New World Order," and you’ll also see the latest crop circle designs, the most recent UFO photos, the image of Christ in an ice cube, a first-hand account from the man who wrestled Bigfoot, the true location of the sunken city of Atlantis, and all manner of non-sense designed to make any important information appear ridiculous by this association.
The Daily Globe is one of two newspapers I’m aware of that exists for this same purpose. This is one of the thin papers that usually sports a headline involving 800-pound Siamese twins suing each other for and against surgical separation, or the poor man whose wife was mysteriously transformed into a hammer-head shark. Because everyone knows that these newspapers epitomize incredulity, they’re the perfect place to print any information that needs to be immediately discredited. "ALIEN ABDUCTEE SAYS U.S. GOV’T BEHIND 9-11 ATTACKS" would be a probable headline.
See how this works? You don’t have to buy the paper. Nobody does. A few copies are prominently displayed near every supermarket checkout line, and this is what people remember when someone tries to warn them that the government of this nation has gotten completely out of control. Their mind makes an association between the important information, and the ridiculous information, and they feel confident that it’s nothing they need to worry about, but they may carry on the silly conversation about UFO’s and stuff just to be polite. Silently they’re convinced that because you tried to warn them about their criminal government, you must also spend your nights on the roof searching the skies for E.T.
There’s also no shortage of TV and movie characters who openly insist that our government is involved in all kinds of heinous activity, but every last one of them is a lunatic. Cosmo Kramer is a recent example. He promotes alternative medicine, doesn’t trust the government, and besides that, he’s completely off the wall. Not the type of lunatic you would fear, but he’s definitely not someone you would look to for reliable information, or even sane discourse. Look closely at every TV character who questions or mistrusts the government, and you will see that this behavior is linked with one abnormal personality after another. The sub-conscious lesson here is that anyone who questions the government or suggests they may be involved in any crime has an abnormal personality, so you can quickly dismiss everything he has to say. Through decades of repetition of these messages, you’ve been taught to ignore any criminality on the part of anyone in our government, and anyone who might make such an accusation. While you were being so trained, you were robbed of your wealth and freedom.
There are people commonly referred to as "conspiracy theorists". In reality, absolutely no one hangs around theorizing about conspiracies, but this label is applied to anyone who feels a civic duty to warn other Americans of criminal activity within their government. The "conspiracy theorist" is a character that only exists on television and in movies, and this character, who is always a lunatic, was created for you to make an association with when someone tries to warn you about government crimes. The result is that when someone tries to explain to you that your own government is doing all it can to either kill or enslave you, he may as well be crying to you about his wife turning into a shark during his most recent UFO abduction, regardless of any proof he has.
For most Americans, the people on TV have replaced their normal human society, and the exchange of ideas they would have once had with neighbors and others in their community is now fed to them via the almighty tube. They are fed two sides of a debate, allowed to choose between them, and this choice allows them to feel a bond with other people of one opinion or the other, and lets them feel like they’re wise enough to have an opinion in the matter, and free enough to express it. The reality here is that neither side of the debate ever contains the entire truth of the matter, but just enough information, or misinformation, to make them feel they’re informed, and give them something to enter a futile debate with, if they did actually talk to their neighbor. Political correctness silenced the rest of them by teaching a reluctance to saying or hearing anything controversial or possibly disturbing.
What Americans are shown on TV are allegedly the products of various independent broadcasting companies who compete for viewers who will supposedly watch the commercial messages that are injected into the entertainment, but if this is the case, why the incredible similarity between the allegedly competing companies? Wouldn’t you think that eventually one network or Hollywood studio might experiment with a sane and respectable character who doesn’t trust the government?
Are there any other typified characters that exist on all networks? As it happens, there are many. Just to name a few; every father is an idiot, as is every private citizen who owns a firearm, every mother is an over-worked and under-appreciated slave, everyone who works for the government is a hero who endlessly risks his life for your protection, and everyone who sells drugs is black or hispanic. Every Arab is a screaming madman, and every Jew is kind, gentle and wise. Every homosexual is moral, kind, and intelligent, and everyone who lives in a rural area of the country is an idiot. I don’t need to go on. You can probably name a few of your own, but the important point here is that the same personality traits transcend all characters on all networks. This is obviously no accident.
If we can see common themes and messages that are being foisted upon the public by all networks, it proves that either there is no real competition between them and they all share a common political goal, or that all of their programing is being influenced or dictated by an outside entity, or both. Nothing else can explain the incredible similarity of stereotyped personality traits in all these fictional characters.
Now the next logical step would be to recognize and list as many of these common themes as possible, and see if they all serve a particular political agenda. Just by skimming the surface we see an effort to thwart private gun ownership, discourage masculinity, encourage homosexuality, promote women to "head of household" status, and foster hatred against all Arabs. Then there are the constant attacks on that "antiquated document" known as the Bill of Rights, which permeate every episode of "Law and Order" and "CSI" ** (if not for that silly forth amendment, all those mangled children would be alive, kind of thing).
Whose interests does this propaganda serve? Who benefits by trying to shape public opinion in this direction? Certainly not the TV viewer, because as well see in the next episode of our action-packed adventure through main-stream media propaganda, the TV viewer’s been taught to work against his own self-interests.
"The C.I.A. owns everyone of any significance in the major media."
---- William Colby, former Director of the CIA
"History is a collection of lies that are no longer being disputed." — Napoleon Bonaparte
** first-hand info here – I was subjected to a lot of TV when I was trapped in a motel for six months, otherwise I haven’t allowed the evil device into my home for more than 25 years.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
